Two dictators, one is doing his best to get rid of foreign backed terrorists trying to steal Syrian oil, one however starves his own people and goes to his fantasy land. Meet Bashar Al-Assad and Nicolas Maduro.
Bashar Al-Assad, yes, he is a dictator to my standards as well, but he gets elected by the people lots of times, cares for Syrians and doesn't want them to starve. He uses Russian aid to equip the Syrian Arab Army to protect Syria and it's vast oil reserves from foreign backed terrorists, that goes to KEBABistan along with their sarin-made weapons under the direct orders of Recep Tayyip KEBABogan. Assad won't even left his people unattended, and would visit the places that needed help, so he won't be seen as what CNN sees as a brutal dictator.
On the other hand, Nicolas Maduro, after succeeding Hugo Chavez(whose first years until his death was supported by Jimmy Carter, the CIA and George Soros) has been printing money, not exploring other non-oil industries, blaming the West for his own shortcomings while eating and eating like a pig while the cameras roll.
Should this be Western propaganda when the cameras kept rolling after his speech attacking the West for starving his people and will eat an empanada soon after.
Bez komentaru.
A dictator that does his best for his people is an enlightened dictator, a dictator that goes to lavish dinners while his people starve because of his inability to lead, is a SCHMUCK.