When i posted my political views about Autocracy on Facebook, i mean enlightened autocratism and not absolute dictatorship. Why would i support brutal dictatorship if i only meant to support an absolute ruler that cares for the welfare of everyone and not of the greedy.
I was reading History books before and i saw the term enlightened despot and despot means, ruled by small group. How about the men or women during the 18th century that was a threat to the Balance of Power but made sure their respective countries would be known and improve within a short time? Not to mention Prussia or Russia or Napoleonic France are good examples but i still look forward to a better and good-hearted one. Why?
In this selfish and world full of lies, it is important now that, a strongman would fulfill the role of sacrificial and powerful dictator. A dictator that would cleanse every evil, improve the social and economical aspects of his/her country, change a weak constitution and remove any harm to the state itself.
Would my critics ask me? Of course. Autocracy has been long associated with dictators. I know. All i want is, someone would take over for the people and not for a small group of people that care for themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment